“The increase in settlements with activists by U.S. companies was the most significant trend in shareholder activism in 2016. Institutional investors have publicly voiced concern about companies settling so easily. It will be interesting to keep an eye on strategic developments at these companies in 2017 and beyond, as well as how these settlements affect management and employee turnover.”

Jay Frankl, Senior Managing Director

Country:
USA

Country: USA

Average % of insider ownership:

3.99
Activism Threat Level: 10

To learn more about this country, please click on the tabs below


With more than 2,600 activist campaigns since 2010, activist shareholders have become increasingly comfortable operating within U.S. jurisdictional requirements. The United States offers a stable regulatory environment and currency conditions, favorable shareholder bylaws, and easy access to capital, all of which make it the “home base” for activist investors.

Shareholders must disclose beneficial ownership of more than 5 percent of a public company’s registered voting equity securities. Investors report holdings using a Schedule 13D filing within 10 business days after their holdings exceeds 5%, unless they are eligible to report their holdings on a short-form Schedule 13G. 13G filings are reserved for investors acting in the ordinary course and without a control purpose or effect (i.e. passive investors).

Under the Securities Exchange Act Rule 14a-8, shareholders that have continuously owned for one year either 1 percent of the shares entitled to vote on the proposal or USD $2,000 worth of shares may submit a proposal to be included in the company’s proxy statement.

Companies may seek “no-action relief” from the SEC to exclude shareholder proposals from their proxy statements.

Structural company defenses include poison pills, staggered boards, limited ability to call a special meeting, and denying replacement of directors without cause. Stringent advance notice and other warning systems for shareholder proposals can serve as a structural defense.

Some states have an anti-takeover statute that prevents shareholders that independently from the board purchased 15 percent or more of a company from engaging in certain business combination transactions with the company for a period of three years.


Top Campaigns by Type

1. Gain Board Representation
2. Amend Bylaw
3. Push for Sale of Company to Third Party

Campaigns By Year

Total
Campaigns

2733

Notable Invested Activists

John Chevedden
Starboard Value
Carl Icahn

Recent activism campaigns

TerraForm Power Inc
VS.
Brookfield Asset Management Inc
PulteGroup Inc
VS.
Elliot Management
HRG Group, Inc.
VS.
Fortress Investment Group LLC

Total Active
Campaigns

286

Contact FTI Consulting

Geoff Serednesky

Capital Markets Research and Activist Engagement
Managing Director
+1 312 861 4721
Geoff.Serednesky@FTIConsulting.com

Bryan Armstrong

Americas Head of Capital Markets Communications
Senior Managing Director
+1 (312) 553 6707
Bryan.Armstrong@fticonsulting.com